9/11 - Key Issue of our Time
Australia's place in the New World Order
An Introduction to Australia's slide into a police state and New World Order.
We Are Change is a citizens based grassroots peace and social justice movement working to reveal the truth behind the events of September 11th, as well as the lies of the government and corporate elite who remain suspect in this crime. In addition, we are here to aid the sick and dying first responders through fund-raising and social outreach programs in order to promote awareness of those who suffer from physical, emotional, and psychological traumas they received in the aftermath of 9-11. We also seek to meet other local citizens who are interested in educating the public while engaging in peaceful demonstration about the pertinent issues that are affecting our lives each and every day. Furthermore, We Are Change is a non-partisan independent media organisation comprised of patriot journalists working to hold those engaging in activities that do not represent the wishes of “We the People” - by asking the hard questions that the controlled mainstream media refuses to do.
We seek to expose the fraud of the left/right paradigm and reveal that the world truly functions on a top/down hierarchy that threatens to destroy free society as we know it. We Are Change works to educate, motivate, and activate those striving to uncover the truth behind the private banking cartel of the military industrial complex that is actively seeking to eliminate national sovereignty and replace it with a "one world order."
We Are Change also seek an uncompromising and independent investigation into the crimes of 9-11, with subpoena power granted to obtain a long-overdue resolution for the survivors and families of the deceased. We reject the official explanation of the events leading up to, during and after the attacks of September 11th, 2001 as well as the fear-based politics and state mandated propaganda being disseminated by the Corporate Media which has facilitated the cover-up of 9-11.
As we establish citizens groups throughout the country and world, we wish to inspire a community of truth-seekers and peacemakers through creative campaigns with a commitment of nonviolence. We Are Change is not so much a group but an idea, an idea that “We the People" are the vehicles of these "ideas" and of the freedoms, liberties, and truths we are seeking all across the globe. An idea that captures the spirits of our forefathers who just desired freedom; that together, as residents of this planet, we grow like a snowball of truth and justice rolling down a mountain of tyranny growing bigger and stronger, recognizing the beauty in our differences and the diverseness of each other, but at the same time strengthening our cause because we learn and grow from each others individuality. Then as we learn to come together, that as one, you, me, him, her, us…will realise that WE ARE CHANGE.
What kind of bomb can do this?
more photos here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7627729.stm
According to news reports the Marriott Hotel blast was produced by 600kg of high quality explosives packed into a lorry. The crater is 6m deep and the devastation appears to cover a very wide area.
Although it is unusual for truck bombs to leave craters like this, the blast crater is reminiscent of a number of high profile bomb blasts over the past few years, such as the Bali Bombing and the Harriri assassination.
Looking at the size of the crater, this seems much larger than the massive Sari Night Club blast. The inside of the hotel is completely destroyed. It is hard to believe that anyone could have survived, which leads one to speculate that the death toll may be higher than the official 53. The attack is of course blamed on "Al Qaeda", but clearly there is advanced military technology at work here.
One suspects that the Cheney war camp is fed up with Pakistan's drift towards democracy.
Black propaganda targets 9/11 Truth
Black propaganda is false material where the source is disguised. It is propaganda that purports to be from a source on one side of a conflict, but is actually from the opposing side. It is typically used to vilify, embarrass or misrepresent the enemy.
21 September 2008
Internet censorship is once again in the news after legendary YouTube user Nuffrespect posted a new video detailing the latest online attack on 9/11 Truth: a user who is creating clones of respected user accounts and truth movement leaders in order to smear 9/11 Truth by posting racist comments. These have already led to the deletion of several well-known accounts in what has been revealed as a coordinated effort to eliminate 9/11 Truth from YouTube.
That CNET admits these videos were removed as a direct result of Lieberman's staff's request is significant, as it was Lieberman who has been urging YouTube to take down "radicalizing" terrorist propaganda since May of this year to bring it into compliance with H.R. 1955, a bill that is currently awaiting approval by the Senate and which would criminalize all dissent of the government. That H.R. 1955 will specifically target the 9/11 Truth community is made obvious by a presentation made to the House Homeland Security Subcommittee in 2007 on "Terrorism and the Internet" which actually listed 9/11 Truth sites alongside terrorist jihad sites as examples of terrorist propaganda on the internet.
At first, YouTube executives made a show of standing up to Lieberman and his tyrannical dictates. "While we respect and understand his views, YouTube encourages free speech and defends everyone's right to express unpopular points of view," a message posted on YouTube said at the time.
Evidently that was mere PR and GooTube—bought out by Google last year—is now showing its roots as a spook-infested CIA front that functions as a virtual branch of government. Now with no warning and little fanfare, they have silently started implementing the government's agenda of taking 9/11 Truth and other forms of dissent off of the premiere video-sharing site.
All of this comes on the heels of numerous blows to free speech on the internet over the preceeding weeks. At the beginning of September, Comcast—America's second-largest internet provider—announced it would set a hard bandwidth limit on its customers in a move that will limit the ability of users to exchange large amounts of data. This of course sets the precedent for other providers to follow suit and it may not be long before the major internet providers are able to squeeze customers' ability to exchange information on the internet in the name of cutting down on bandwidth usage.
Also this month, reports emerged of a shadowy United Nations group known as "Q6/17" which is working with China and the NSA to develop a system to trace the source of all internet communications. Of course, as the linked article points out, such a feature would be useless as all serious hacking attempts these days rely on spoofed addresses in the first place and such traceback features are likely to be used by the very people they are designed to detect. But perhaps creating chaos on an internet that is increasingly becoming an overglorified wiretap is itself part of a much larger plan.
Indeed, the myriad ways in which the internet is under attack is too large to list in one article, but some more ideas of just how 9/11 Truth and free speech on the internet in general is being suppressed may be gleaned from the video below:
Brussels 9/11 Truth March - Video
This is the Nuoviso Filmproduktion snippet from the Brussels march with englisch subtitles. The source is from http://www.frank-hoefer.blogspot.com/
How terror cell "pre-crime" convictions subvert democracy
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.
- T.S. Eliot
by Hereward Fenton
20 September, 2008
The conviction last week of Muslim cleric Abdul Nacer Benbrika and five other men on terrorism charges was widely covered in the Australian news. We were given a colourful story of plots to blow up sports stadiums and oaths of loyalty to terrorist leaders, but there is another aspect to all this which we did not hear on the news: these convictions were the result of a police entrapment program. Members of the so-called terrorist group were coached by undercover police over months to make incriminating statements which were secretly recorded. The entire Crown case against the men is based on these recorded "confessions".
Benbrika's defence lawyers submitted that he was "a bumbling fool who thought it was possible to drive to Tasmania and could not lead ants to sugar". Indeed, none of the men has been found guilty of conspiring in or carrying out any specific crime - other than being members of a group which the Crown has deemed to be a "terrorist group".
Paradoxically, the group was closely monitored at all times by undercover police who collaborated with the accused in order to obtain incriminating statements. Even so, the police were not able to extract more than very generalised and vague statements from the accused.
Reminiscent of the science fiction film "Minority Report", the guilty are guilty not because of what they have done or even planned to do, but rather because of what they "might" do.
Here is an extract from one of the secretly recorded "confessions", presented as evidence of an "oath of loyalty to the organisation and to the cause":
AMER HADDARA (translated): What do I say?
ABDUL NACER BENBRIKA (translated): Yes, say I pledge you.
AMER HADDARA: I pledge you.
ABDUL NACER BENBRIKA: To obey Allah and his messenger.
AMER HADDARA: To obey Allah and his messenger.
ABDUL NACER BENBRIKA: And if I disobey Allah and his messenger, then there is no, I mean, I will disobey you.
AMER HADDARA: Then I will disobey you.
ABDUL NACER BENBRIKA: That's it, that's the one.
Such a pledge is common in terrorist cells around the world, according to terrorism expert David Wright-Neville from Monash University.
The following "evidence" was printed in The Australian:
In one conversation with an undercover police officer, Benbrika asked how much explosive would be needed to blow up a house or larger building. In another, with one of his followers, he talked about blasting buildings and doing something 'big'.
Here is a transcript of a police interview, recorded "at 4:00AM" on the day of the arrest:
DETECTIVE: If somebody asked you to undertake jihad, would you?
AMER HADDARA: If there is certain evidence that proves that it is allowed, then I would.
DETECTIVE: When is it allowed?
AMER HADDARA: It's allowed once the pressure is applied.
DETECTIVE: Do you think pressure is happening in this country at the moment?
AMER HADDARA: It is.
DETECTIVE: Are you happy enough to martyr yourself?
AMER HADDARA: I wish, as a wish I would love to go to paradise, and if, you know, if that's a way, if it's a way of doing so and there is such an avenue then I'll go down that path no problem.
DETECTIVE: What I would call a suicide bomber, the person who straps on a bomb vest, and runs into - well we'll use Iraq for example, that's my idea of a martyrdom operation. Would you go to that extent?
AMER HADDARA: If I had to and there was such extremes, yes.
The charges against the men were as follows:
1. Intentionally being a member of a terrorist organisation, knowing that it was a terrorist organisation.
2. Intentionally directing the activities of a terrorist organisation, knowing that it was a terrorist organisation
3. Intentionally providing resources to a terrorist organisation, knowing that it was a terrorist organisation
Note that none of these charges relate to any specific terrorist plot. There was no actual conspiracy. There was no planned attack. This point is lost in media coverage of the convictions. If the prosecutors had been able, they would have certainly tried to get convictions on charges of conspiracy - but they could not make this stick. Instead they were forced to press charges based on anti-terror laws which are pre-emptive in nature.
Despite the lack of legally admissibale evidence, the mainstream media continues to push the idea that there was an actual plot of some kind:
The Herald Sun also reveals today that taped conversations indicated Benbrika's terrorist organisation may have been planning an attack on polling day during the 2004 federal election.
Note the phrase "may have been". By the same token, Benbrika's "terrorist organisation" may have been planning to fly to the moon. This blatant media spin has nothing to do with either legal process or consensual reality. The scenario depicted above is an invention of the media. It is, by any reasonable definition, fiction.
Why is there not a massive protest movement against this corruption of the legal framework of our society? Why can't people seem to understand the threat? Perhaps it is because those being persecuted are foreign types wearing funny hats. Maybe it's because we are more interested in Britney Spears' current hair style. Either way, this blinkered and self centered ignorance will ultimately be our undoing, allowing our would-be rulers to dismantle the remaining protections we have, after which protest will be futile because we will already effectively be prisoners in the new slave state.
Tragically, there is no meaningful resistance against this outrageous assault on our liberty. Our only protest is in blogs read by a handful of people.
Truth Action - September 11 - ABC Studios
Thanks to Dani for this well crafted video.
A FEAR LESS TRILOGY - Summary of Events
By John Bursill - Truth Action Sydney
"Exposing the Delusion of 9/11 Down under!"
Well, just as the rest of the world does, Australia continues to step up to new
heights in our 9/11 Truth campaign, forcing the reality of the September 11 Attacks
into the light! Sydney Truth Action decided to put on three events for the
anniversary this year, back to back on the 11th, 12th and 13th of September. We are
determined to reach a bigger audience with the "truth to peace" message, aiming it
directly at the Peace Groups that have resisted us for so long.
Here is a brief summary of these three events..
Event 1 - Public Meeting - DELUSION 911 - September 11th, 2008
Wow, this really was a huge success drawing approximately 200 people to the heart of
the city on a week night. It was especially significant because there was basically
no support from any political, social or media group, except for NEXUS magazine and
one email from the NSW Greens which was sent out to the members as a "What's on"
event in the Green E-Brief. The Greens unfortunately, after pressure from above
withdrew their support for this information distribution, even though the
membership's interest is high and they have received all the relevant evidence over
the last two years, proving our case. This I feel was a form of censorship, which is
very disappointing indeed, as they have refused to alert people of a public meeting
by the "Grass Roots" who are trying to bring peace to the world?
Even though the meeting did not officially start until 7pm the crowd was arriving
from 6pm, many brimming with excitement that such an event was even possible. People
were very interested in the merchandise we had for sale especially Barrie Zwicker's
Book "The Towers of Deception" which sold out early on the second night! The mood
was what I would call, simply "electric" and the attendees had a thirst to learn all
they could, many wanting to start conversations with the speakers while they were
speaking. This is probably a bad idea, lol.for those that did such...
Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?
By David Ray Griffin
9 September 2008
Much of America's foreign policy since 9/11 has been based on the assumption that it was attacked by Muslims on that day. This assumption was used, most prominently, to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. It is now widely agreed that the use of 9/11 as a basis for attacking Iraq was illegitimate: none of the hijackers were Iraqis, there was no working relation between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, and Iraq was not behind the anthrax attacks. But it is still widely believed that the US attack on Afghanistan was justified. For example, the New York Times, while referring to the US attack on Iraq as a "war of choice," calls the battle in Afghanistan a "war of necessity." Time magazine has dubbed it "the right war." And Barack Obama says that one reason to wind down our involvement in Iraq is to have the troops and resources to "go after the people in Afghanistan who actually attacked us on 9/11."
The assumption that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11 also lies behind the widespread perception of Islam as an inherently violent religion and therefore of Muslims as guilty until proven innocent. This perception surely contributed to attempts to portray Obama as a Muslim, which was lampooned by a controversial cartoon on the July 21, 2008, cover of The New Yorker.
As could be illustrated by reference to many other post-9/11 developments, including as spying, torture, extraordinary rendition, military tribunals, America's new doctrine of preemptive war, and its enormous increase in military spending, the assumption that the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were attacked by Muslim hijackers has had enormous negative consequences for both international and domestic issues.1
Is it conceivable that this assumption might be false? Insofar as Americans and Canadians would say "No," they would express their belief that this assumption is not merely an "assumption" but is instead based on strong evidence. When actually examined, however, the proffered evidence turns out to be remarkably weak. I will illustrate this point by means of 16 questions.
Pax Britannica & The New World Order
Imperial roots of today's evolving world system.
By Tom Piccone
The New World Order -- You have probably heard these words used in recent years, perhaps beginning with President George Bush in 1990.
But what does this phrase mean? Who has been using the expression? When and where did this idea of a new world order originate? How will this new world order be implemented? More importantly, how will this new world order affect you?
The words "new world order" have been in use for decades, and did not originate with President Bush. The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states. The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government.
Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, health care, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance, and will mean the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them.
Origins of The New World Order
In the late nineteenth century, with the industrial revolution sweeping Europe and America, certain individuals dreamed of a world far different from the one in which they lived, a world organized in such a way that wars would be impossible and every aspect of human life would be arranged by educated men for the benefit of all. These dreamers included men of great ability and wealth who devoted their talents and fortunes to carry out their plans. The point of origin of these people was England, and their idea initially was to extend the British Empire to include the whole earth. If British rule were complete, how could there be any reason for war, and who could attempt it?
The most prominent of the individuals who developed the idea of a new world order were Cecil Rhodes, Andrew Carnegie, and members of the Fabian Society, particularly H. G. Wells.
Cecil Rhodes went from England to Africa in an attempt to improve his poor health, and acquired enormous wealth by developing diamond mining properties. He died in 1902 and donated his fortune to establish a Rhodes scholarship program at Oxford University to carry out his ideas. The scholarships were to go to promising young men from the British colonies and the United States, with the majority going to Americans.
Andrew Carnegie went from Scotland to the United States and founded U. S. Steel, earning for himself a substantial sum of money. Carnegie used his wealth to set up foundations to fund educational, religious, and political organizations to "cultivate the international mind" and promote world peace. Some of his money went to the Federal Council of Churches. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace was established, and began funding educational initiatives. By the end of World War II, the U. S. State Department was largely controlled by Rhodes scholars and members of this Carnegie Endowment, and was emphasizing the idea of world peace through the United Nations.
The Fabian Society was a group of intellectuals in England who believed that socialism was the way to organize the world for social and economic progress. H.G. Wells was originally a member of the Fabian Society and wrote extensively on political topics, influencing thinking in international affairs. In one of his books, entitled The New World Order (1939), Wells stated that world socialism was inevitable, and that there would be a difficult and painful transition period in which many "quite gallant and graceful-looking people" would "die protesting against it."
Structure of The New World Order
The basic concept of the new world order is world government. For Rhodes and Carnegie, it was British rule expanded to cover the earth, or at least British influence through English-speaking countries to organize the rest of world according to the English way of life and thinking. Wells and others set out to bring the world under socialism, step by step, in a gradual process. Over the years, proposals were made successively for world federation, a League of Nations, and the United Nations.
The new world order is to be implemented through regionalism. Basically, the world is to be divided into geographical regions, internationally, nationally, and locally, and these regions are to be the new units of government, replacing the old, traditional notions of nation-states, cities, towns, villages, etc. Control over every aspect of human life is to be exercised in the form of an administrative dictatorship, from the top down, through an enormous bureaucracy of appointed officials, specialists, and planners accountable only to the elected executives.
Political power is to be concentrated in the executive branch of government, removing it from the control of the people through their elected legislative representatives. The choices presented to the people for the elected executives are limited to candidates selected by the political establishment, and not by the people themselves. In this way, the outward form of democracy is retained to an extent, but the power is entirely taken away from the people and concentrated in government.
The transition to world government is being carried out gradually, with appropriate "education" of the populace, until the system is fully in place. Forces have joined together to push for world government, first by one means, and then by another after the first method meets opposition. These forces never stop. They never admit defeat. There is only delay, and then new ideas of how to bring the entire world into a planned administrative system.
Truth News Radio Australia - live from the Tom Mann Theatre
On Friday, 12 September, we recorded our show with a live studio audience at the Tom Mann Theatre in Sydney.
The show featured a panel discussion followed by a question and answer session. On the panel we had the pleasure of the company the following esteemed guests:
- Gillian Norman (Film Maker)
- John Bursill (Boeing Engineer)
- Dr. Frank Legge (Chemist)
- James O’Neill (Barrister at Law)
- Dr. David Leifer (Architect and member of ae911truth.org)
The panel engaged in a lively critique of the new Italian 9/11 film Zero, and we covered a variety of other topics, some of which proved to be controversial within the group.
A big thankyou from Josh and myself to everyone who helped make this happen, especially Jose who managed to find an essential piece of equipment at the last moment!
Please pass this podcast link on to your friends and feel free to download and burn to disk if you wish.
I hope to have the video version online soon.
Amy Goodman discusses her arrest
Amy Goodman discusses her arrest, the arrests of her colleagues, police response to demonstrators, and freedom of the press at the Republican National Convention.
Aired on September 5, 2008 on NOW on PBS.
Breaking The Silence - Truth and Lies in the War on Terror
An astounding documentary from John Pilger (2003). The film ends with the chilling words "If we remain silent, victory over us is assured".
Award-winning journalist John Pilger investigates the discrepancies between American and British claims for the 'war on terror' and the facts on the ground as he finds them in Afghanistan and Washington, DC. In 2001, as the bombs began to drop, George W. Bush promised Afghanistan "the generosity of America and its allies".
Now, the familiar old warlords are regaining power, religious fundamentalism is renewing its grip and military skirmishes continue routinely. In "liberated" Afghanistan, America has its military base and pipeline access, while the people have the warlords who are, says one woman, "in many ways worse than the Taliban". In Washington, Pilger conducts a series of remarkable interviews with William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, and leading Administration officials such as Douglas Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, and John Bolton, Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security.
These people, and the other architects of the Project for the New American Century, were dismissed as 'the crazies' by the first Bush Administration in the early 90s when they first presented their ideas for pre-emptive strikes and world domination.
Pilger also interviews presidential candidate General Wesley Clark, and former intelligence officers, all the while raising searching questions about the real motives for the 'war on terror'.
While President Bush refers to the US attacks on Afghanistan and Iraq as two 'great victories', Pilger asks the question - victories over whom, and for what purpose? Pilger describes Afghanistan as a country "more devastated than anything I have seen since Pol Pot's Cambodia". He finds that Al-Qaida has not been defeated and that the Taliban is re-emerging. And of the "victory" in Iraq, he asks: "Is this Bush's Vietnam?"
400 European truth activists march in Brussels
BRUSSELS - SEPTEMBER 11, 2008
Last Sunday over 400 European truth activists ignored the rain and had a non-violent march in Brussels. They gathered at 2 P.M. in front of the Berlaymont building at Schuman, Brussels. At 3 P.M. they took a walk of 4 kilometers with a stop at the US Embassy. Before the rally left, the organizers delivered a letter to the assistant to Giulietto Chiesa, Euro-MP for Italy. Under police guidance they tried to deliver a letter containing their request to start an independent and international investigation to what happened in the U.S.A. just 7 years ago. They were told that the embassy was closed and didn't accept their letter unless is was delivered by mail. There were no incidents during the protests, and the organizers were once again very positive about the collaboration with the Brussels Police.
Furthermore, the platform is endorsed by various Non Governmental Organizations like The Committee for the Abolition of Third World Debt (CATMD), CODIP, ReOpen911 and ATTAC Brussels. The first Belgian political party CAP (Comité Autre Politique) joined the rally at the end.
The platform these people and organizations support is: "In solidarity with the American citizens, we demand an independent investigation of the 9/11 attacks, which were the pretext for too many wars, lies, and a serious decrease of (y)our civil rights ("anti-terrorist"-acts, secret prisons, "Patriot act", etc). We want European troops back home! We want European laws that guarantee neutrality of the internet and that explicitly forbid tracing/chipping (RFID) of human beings as well as other electronic threats on our freedom. We want democratic and public control of financial organizations (IMF, WB, etc) and the mass media. But most of all we want to get our life back."
United for Truth made its first public appearance in September 2007. They organized the first European protest in Brussels calling to support a majority of the American people, who want a re-investigation of the 9/11 attacks. This protest is coordinated by two Belgian artists; a 25 year old Dutch speaking producer who associated with a 41 year old French speaking percussionist.
English & Dutch: Julez Edward, +32 479 936 236
French & Spanish: Olivier Galand, +32 477 257 255
Protest Outside ABC Studio - 11 September 2008
The Sydney Truth Action group will be staging a protest outside ABC studios in Ultimo on Thursday, 11 September from 11:00 AM - 01:00 PM (see map).
This is a great opportunity to make a difference, and let our (taxpayer funded) national broadcaster know we require that they exercise due diligence in covering matters of grave public concern such as 9/11.
According to a recent report, Australia currently has 1080 troops deployed in Afghanistan, yet neither the Taliban leaders nor Osama bin Laden have ever been indicted for the terrorist attacks on 9/11!
We have been misled into a conflict which has no basis in international law.
9/11 was never properly investigated.
Can we continue to allow our fellow Australians to kill and to die for a lie?
Voice your concern and join us in protest on 11 September.
Four Corners forum discusses "The Third Tower"
Last Night ABC TV (Australia) aired the BBC documentary The Third Tower, which purports to be an objective investigation into "conspiracy theories swirling over 9/11".
This morning there a number of discussion topics on the Four Corners website dedicated to the topic, and from a quick look it is clear once again, as was demonstrated when ABC Unleashed published a short opinion piece on 9/11 unanswered questions, that the public is simply not satisfied with the level of journalistic integrity evidenced by the major media.
Last night's programme on World Trade Centre 7 was neither, “Investigative" nor "Journalism". It was just a rerun of a BBC programme that left major questions unanswered. I expected more from my ABC. If this is your measure of the qualities to which you apparently hold yourselves to, then everything that you show from this point on has no credibility.
There is so much more that needs to be explained here.
All systems go for the Trilogy of Truth starting this Thursday
Tonight we visited the Tom Mann Theatre in Surry Hills, to prepare and plan for the trilogy of truth starting this Thursday, 11 September - at 7pm.
The detailed program can be found on this page.
Be there or be square!
Amy Goodman is arrested and cuffed
Democracy Now presenter Amy Goodman has been arrested and charged with obstructing legal process, and two other DN staff are under arrest pending felony P.C. (probable cause) riot charges.
Goodman was arrested while questioning police about the unlawful detention of Democracy Now producers Sharif Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar who were arrested while they carried out their journalistic duties in covering street demonstrations at the Republican National Convention.
In the video you can see Amy being cuffed and led away by riot police.
Please visit Democracy Now for more information on this breaking story.
Democracy Now are asking all concerned members of the public to contact the Ramsey County Attorney's Office and to demand that they not press charges against Kouddous and Salazar.
Ramsey County Attorney Susan Gaertner
RCA at co.ramsey.mn.us (cc: dropthecharges at democracynow.org)
Susan Gaertner for Governor
info at susangaertner.com (cc: dropthecharges at democracynow.org)
Note: Be sure to cc: firstname.lastname@example.org on all emails so that DN can deliver print outs of your messages to the St. Paul City Attorney and Ramsey County Attorney offices.
Jesse Ventura - Man of Truth
We present two recent video clips featuring former Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura. He is one of the most important voices for 9/11 Truth today. It is especially encouraging to see a man with such impeccable credentials clearly advocating the most important arguments in favour of a new investigation of 9/11.
This man cannot be ignored or ridiculed. This is the core of the movement. This will bring change.
Jesse Ventura (born July 15, 1951 as James George Janos), also known as "The Body", "The Star", and "The Governing Body", is an American politician, retired professional wrestler, Navy UDT veteran, actor, and former radio and television talk show host. He was inducted into the WWE Hall of Fame in 2004. He is also a former co-holder of the AWA World tag team title with Adrian Adonis.
In the Minnesota gubernatorial election of 1998, running as an Independent and member of the Reform Party, he was elected the 38th Governor of Minnesota and served from January 4, 1999 to January 6, 2003 without seeking a second term.
America is on the Brink of Fascism! Jesse Ventura
Jesse Ventura Speaks About 9/11 at Ron Paul Rally (9/2/08)