911oz - Australian 9/11 Truth Movement

contact: admin@911oz.com

Bookmark and Share   PageRank Checking Tool    RSS

Just Foreign Policy Iraqi Death Estimator

Syndicated Articles

To share your thoughts, join the 911oz Forum

Architects & Engineers
for 9/11 Truth

As seen in this revealing photo the Twin Towers' destruction exhibited all the characteristics of destruction by explosions:


Extremely rapid onset of “collapse”


Sounds of explosions at plane impact zone — a full second prior to collapse (heard by 118 first responders as well as by media reporters)


Observations of flashes (seen by numerous professionals)


Squibs, or “mistimed” explosions, 40 floors below the “collapsing” building seen in all the videos


Mid-air pulverization of all the 90,000 tons of concrete and steel decking, filing cabinets & 1000 people – mostly to dust


Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds


Vertical progression of full building perimeter demolition waves


Symmetrical collapse – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall speed — the columns gave no resistance


1,400 foot diameter field of equally distributed debris – outside of building footprint


Blast waves blew out windows in buildings 400 feet away


Lateral ejection of thousands of individual 20 - 50 ton steel beams up to 500 feet


Total destruction of the building down to individual structural steel elements – obliterating the steel core structure.


Tons of molten Metal found by FDNY under all 3 high-rises (no other possible source other than an incendiary cutting charge such as Thermate)


Chemical signature of Thermate (high tech incendiary) found in slag, solidified molten metal, and dust samples by Physics professor Steven Jones, PhD.


FEMA finds rapid oxidation and intergranular melting on structural steel samples


More than 1000 Bodies are unaccounted for — 700 tiny bone fragments found on top of nearby buildings

And exhibited none of the characteristics of destruction by fire, i.e.


Slow onset with large visible deformations


Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires)


Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel


High-rise buildings with much larger, hotter, and longer lasting fires have never “collapsed”

9/11 - Key Issue of our Time

Australian 9/11 Truth Movement Statement
11 September 2010

9/11 Eyewitness Testimony of Mr. David Long


28 August 2010

David Long, Eyewitness to the 9/11/2001 Attacks from Truth Action Ottawa on Vimeo.

On May 8, 2009, members of Truth Action Ottawa interviewed Mr. David Long, who was in downtown Manhattan the morning of September 11, 2001. Mr. Long recounts everything he saw and heard that morning, including multiple streams of molten metal pouring from the buildings before they fell, and the sounds of multiple explosions as the buildings came down.

posted 31 Aug 2010 22:01 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

One million New Yorkers will see this ad - your generous donation is needed



26 August 2010


Dear Friends,

We are pleased and tremendously excited to share this groundbreaking TV ad with you for the first time. We hope, with your help, to be able to show it to one million New Yorkers one month from now. Please go to BuildingWhat.org to watch the ad and please donate generously. Every $750 we raise is enough for another spot to reach another 10,000 people. Your donation will be fully tax-deductible. 5% of it will go to the WTC Rescuers Foundation. And 5% of it will be matched by another generous donor.

Our strategy for buying spots is guided by two principles. Firstly, showing it to audiences who will respond productively and influence the public discussion, such as young people, academics, journalists and the political class. And secondly, repetition!

We will be sending off the ad two weeks from now. Between now and then we welcome your comments. We're all in this together!

Very truly yours,

Manny Badillo, Nephew of Thomas Joseph Sgroi
David Chandler, International Center of 9/11 Studies
Richard Gage, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
David Ray Griffin, Religious Leaders for 9/11 Truth
Niels Harrit, Coauthor of the WTC Nanothermite Study
Karen Johnson, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth
Erik Lawyer, Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
Bob McIlvaine, Father of Bobby McIlvaine
JF Ranger, World for 9/11 Truth
Atmoh, ReOpen911.info
Kevin Ryan, Coeditor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies
Ted Tilton Jr. and Justin Keogh, 911Blogger.com
William Veale, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth
Ted Walter, NYC CAN

posted 27 Aug 2010 11:04 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

9/11 Truth for Peace? Sydney's Sept 11 Anniversary Protest Calls for End of Afghan War!


RSVP TO JOIN PROTEST: www.meetup.com/wearechange-oz/calendar/14531214/

John Bursill | 24 August 2010

So why should we believe that “9/11 Truth” can stop the war in Afghanistan and bring the “War on Terrorism” to an end?

9/11 Truth For Peace

I will lay out below the non-conspiratorial reasons why it is vitally important that we continue to demand accountability from our governments, on why it is they went to war on our behalf in 2001. I will also argue why I am correct to strongly assert that the pursuit of 9/11 truth and a criminal investigation of those events is the only practical path to peace today. Details of an upcoming Sydney “9/11 Truth for Peace” Protest on September 11th, 2010 are at the bottom of this article.


On the 11th of September 2001 the world entered a very dark chapter of its history! We were promised a 100 years of war in this “New American Century” fighting “the terrorists” wherever the American Empire deemed they were, and at the time of their choosing. We were told that this “New Pear Harbor” event carried out on 9/11 by the CIA born Al-Qaeda was a fair and reasonable reason to carry out a preemptive strike against their supporters the Taliban, by the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.

The vast majority of the world’s population and its governments rallied behind the US determined to fight Islamic terrorism together world wide. Although some more skeptical commentators and governments were cautious with their support for this so called “War on Terrorism”, they found themselves intimidated into silence. For the Bush/Cheney Administration and its powerful media supporters made it abundantly clear “that you are with us or you are with the terrorists” GWB.

The newly elected (?) Bush Administration and its Neo-Con agenda (Rebuilding America’s Defenses) went into full swing in the last few months of 2001 by the use of this powerful new catalyst of fear, 9/11. The American public was so angry and shocked by 9/11 that they were literally cheering for revenge and in full support of military retaliation. Innocently and traumatized they trusted the story they were told about 9/11 without evidence, and also trusted that George W. Bush would lead them to victory against the terrorists and capture Osama Bin Laden “dead or alive”! Still for the Bush Administration to be able to see their new “pre-emptive war doctrine” slide into position with an Afghan War, rather than being seen as a “war crime”, the US Government had to give many assurances to the world and it’s governments. Assurances that evidence would be produced to prove their Bin Laden Al-Qaeda “conspiracy theory” in a White Paper and that they would investigate how it was that the attacks happened. Making that investigation the basis of their policy to stop such terrorism into the future. They would with out a doubt address their massive military and intelligence failures on 9/11 and make changes to prevent any further now expected attacks.

They also made many hollow promises to the American people. Like they would look after the welfare of the 9/11 First Responders, who are still waiting for basic health care as they fall in the thousands to the effects of the toxic dust they were told was safe! They also said they would get to the bottom of the massive and unprecedented structural failures of the three WTC towers 1, 2 and 7. Those towers that fell that day at near or actual free fall speeds led to the death of 343 New York Firefighters and thousands of civilians who never imagined the buildings would collapse at all. Today a growing number of Firefighters, Engineers, Architects, Scientists and building professionals question these collapses as inconsistent with being caused by fire and aircraft damage alone. The collapse of building 7 (not hit by a plane) and the discovery of Nano-Thermite in the collapse dust being the clearest evidence that pre-planted explosives and incendiaries charges within the buildings assisted in their destruction. Who did this and why and how it happened is clearly needed to be investigated in a criminal court immediately.

Unfortunately it is true and un-controversial to state unequivocally that we, the public have received none of what the US Government assured us they would deliver. Rather we have seen in an unprecedented manner the most obvious and ruthless cover up and destruction of evidence and testimony around the events of 9/11. This lack of accountability is most starkly supported by the statement by the chairs of the 9/11 Commission Report, that “they were set up to fail” and that NIST the National Institute of Science and Technology is unable to explain many aspects of the building collapses. Some of the things they can not and will not explain include; the actual collapse sequence of the Twin Towers, the molten iron found at ground zero and the simply unbelievable “absolute” free fall of building 7 for over 100ft of its fall! To this day, we the people of the world have no idea based on official “testable” reports of what really happened on 9/11! Who is responsible for those heinous crimes is a question that simply can not be answered without a criminal investigation. Secrecy is everywhere and truth, transparency and justice are nowhere to be seen?

The 9/11 Truth Movement world wide have been demanding a new investigation of the events of September 11, 2001 for 9 years now and have continuously pointed out that we should withdraw the troops from Afghanistan immediately until we know who is responsible for the 9/11 Attacks. The FBI still have not indicted Bin Laden for 9/11 as the say they have “no hard evidence” connecting him to those events? Disturbingly Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the so called “mastermind” of the 9/11 attacks, whose tortured testimony is the basis of the official 9/11 “conspiracy theory” in the “9/11 Commission Report” remains un-charged to this day for those crimes?

Although much work has been done by citizen researchers to discover who may or may not have been involved with carrying out the 9/11 Attacks, such endeavors are impossible to fulfill without subpoena power in a courtroom.

Recently two more Australians died in Afghanistan fighting a provably illegal war on behalf of the Australian Government’s support for the “War on Terrorism”. This Government support of the war is based on the the understanding that the 9/11 Attacks were a direct result of the Taliban supporting and harboring the terrorists responsible for the crimes committed on 9/11. Remove this justification and their is absolutely no reason for any further support! This 9/11 war in Afghanistan has now taken 20 of Australia’s finest in the field, which is double the number of Australians that where killed on 9/11. How many innocent Afghans have died because of the invasion and occupation is anyone guess as the media and the military have little interest in finding out the true figures to date. Estimates put it at approximately 30,000 people, although it’s probably a much greater number?

The Australian 9/11 Truth Movement are determined to expose to the Australian people the facts that dispute the legitimacy of the official story of 9/11! They continue to demand that Australian troops are immediately removed from Afghanistan until 9/11 is properly investigated and evidence is produced to demonstrate Afghanistan is responsible in any way for those attacks!

It is clear from the simple facts that are on the public record that nine years on there is no mandate or excuse for the invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, and that 9/11 truth is the only practical path to peace today. With out exposing that the pretext to this war is simply not based in reality, the anger and hatred of the people in the west ignorant of the facts will allow the bloodshed to continue.

A protest will be held in Sydney’s Hyde Park in the vicinity of the War Memorial (Map) on the 9th anniversary of the September 11th Attacks. Hereward Fenton the organizer and member of “We Are Change – Sydney” says “this protest will be held in honor of the Australian lives lost on 9/11 and the brave soldiers who have fallen since in Afghanistan in their name. We also will remember the innocent Afghan deaths and hope that we can help bring Afghanistan to peace!”. The protest will be static in nature commencing at 11am on Saturday the 11th of September and continuing to approximately 2pm that day. Hereward can be contacted at admin@911oz.com or call him on +61415059675


posted 26 Aug 2010 19:08 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

Announcing the launch of 911truthnews.com


Announcing the launch of 911truthnews.com

The editors of 9/11 Truth News are pleased to present 911truthnews.com. 9/11 Truth News is intended to be an accessible and factually oriented first reference for those curious about 9/11 truth. Our movement must serve its audience and this site was created for that purpose. 

The key to effectively serving this purpose is our strategy. That starts with the site being solely related to 9/11 truth and edited by four longtime movement activists. With a good deal of thought about who we need to reach and the obstacles that stand in the way of reaching them, the editors of 911truthnews.com will be publishing only that which we believe to be the best this movement has to offer. 

What does 'the best' look like? Uplifting images of people committed to educating the public. Videos of thoughtful actions and real connections with our audience. Stories of our mutual challenges and cooperative successes. Important discoveries. Revealing hit pieces. Thoughtful commentary. The best looks like positive movement. 

In order for this site to reflect the best this movement has to offer, we will need help from the movement to keep us informed about what we might include. We need people to help us find relevant news. We need groups to send us their best images and videos of their actions and events. We need people to help us fill out the resources section by submitting links to related history, our strongest evidence, and information relevant movement strategy. 

Commenting is provided on our site primarily to allow readers to post thoughtful questions and commentary that enhances the educational value of our posts. We will be strictly moderating comments to maintain that educational value. If you'd like to comment, please stay on topic and don't get too heavily into details, speculation or debate. 

9/11 Truth News. Please check out the site and if you like what you see, bookmark us, visit us regularly and spread the word. Also, please let us know if there are any huge bugs. We're still working out some browser issues. 


If you'd like more information about the project please have a look at our ABOUT section. 


If you would like to comment please read the COMMENT page before registering. 


To submit a suggestion about content you can use our CONTENT page. 


To contact the editors about the site please use our CONTACT page. 


Thanks for your time and your commitment to 9/11 justice. 


The 9/11 Truth News team

posted 23 Aug 2010 15:25 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

TNRA & 911oz criticised for targeting Catherine Taylor over ABC bias

TNRA & 911oz have been criticised for targeting Catherine Taylor over perceived bias and censorship at the ABC. We publish below, in full, the anonymous letter received today.

Anonymous | 18 August 2010

I've got a lot of admiration for 911oz’s  efforts to publicize 911 issues and I applaud that but I'm not sure your current focus, the "Catherine Taylor project", isn't misplaced. Please let me explain why. I think there are issues here you need to think through.

You have to ask yourself what you are trying to achieve here given (1) the person targeted, (2) their knowledge of 911 issues and (3) what knowledge items you expect the target person can publicly stand by or publicize (4) given their social and political setting.

Keep in mind that many at the ABC, unlike most media figures, almost certainly understand that the official 911 account has holes in it and that the 911 Commission was a highly sanitized process. In an ideal world -- unencumbered by political constraints and a wealth of other compelling political issues (Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, GFC, global warming etc) -- they would probably be happy to push 911 questions via their website. Moreover, it is a common mistake of 911 truth activists to wrongly believe that MSM journalists haven't really looked at 911 issues. Many of them have, and most of them would be aware of the main arguments, including demolition theories of the WTC buildings. So it is a serious misunderstanding, I believe, to operate on the basis that MSM figures like Catherine Taylor only need to have more facts put in front of them and a light bulb will flash somewhere and their lives will be consumed with a desire to speak to others about 911. It's never going to happen. You are wasting your time if you are pursuing such a process. Worse, if you apply public pressure to force acceptance of your views then you are almost certainly increasing the likelihood that the person you are targeting will regard your efforts as an abuse and firmly and finally shut the ABC door on you, you views, and those of any other 911 activists. Is that what you want? No-one likes to be bullied or spoken about in the third person as if they are some sort of object ("The Catherine Taylor project")

Whether you like it or not, the position you are in is no different from someone who walks in off the street and tries to sell someone life insurance, a vacuum cleaner or an encyclopedia. You need the other person; they don't need you! And if you ever forget that and engage in any behavior that they see as rude then they can (and will!) withdraw their cooperation immediately.

If you mistakenly believe that a public "name and shame" program targeting Catherine Taylor will "force" some 911 cooperation then you have a serious misunderstanding of how high profile public media managers operate. Sure, you can bully the editors of The Australian if you think you can work it because, by and large, they are a lost cause loaded down with Right wing bilge and used to floggings from the Left. So go for it. But someone like Catherine Taylor (and anyone from the ABC, or some of The Age writers) are in a different position. These are people who are anti-establishment by nature. As I say, in an ideal world they would probably be happy to give 911 issues a run. But (and it's a big BUT...) they don't live in a politically neutral world. They can run a story where an Australian engineering Professor, the Head of a Department or prominent at the CSIRO, comes out and pans the official WTC story. That's news. What they can't do is ignore the story leads of other MSM agencies and go off and editorially conduct themselves as if they are publishing a student union newspaper. Lead stories on 911 "conspiracy theories" are about as usable to them as economic commentary from Trotsky supporters at the World Wide Socialist Web. Yeah, they might privately sympathize, even agree, but the political context does not allow them to provide editorial lead to such views -- and what they will categorically NOT do is be is bullied by you into adopting such an editorial policy!

Some time ago the ABC published a crappy piece on "conspiracy theories" by a crap psychologist, Stephan Lewandowsky. To the outsider that would like a debunking of 911 theories, however, when you examine the large number of 911 "conspiracy" comments they allowed, it is very clear the ABC were giving a big run to some of our views that they could not normally run. Read between the lines here, mate. They WANTED us to put our views but were culturally constrained from doing so directly. But if you don't do nuance then people like Catherine Taylor will stop giving us a back door entry and simply keep us out in the cold.

Here's the Lewandowsky story and you should review the comments to see how much 911 truth got in there. The ABC is giving us a run, you just have to have the eyes to see it.


So, I think your The Catherine Taylor project is SERIOUSLY misdirected. All can you do is piss this lady off and for no good reason.

You can do whatever you want of course and I wish you well. Here's what I would be doing however if I was in your shoes. I'd be writing to her and THANKING her for the profile the ABC has previously given to 911 issues. I'd be noting that the ABC Drum's recent article by Stephan Lewandowsky supposedly debunking "conspiracy theories" rightfully drew considerable criticisms from the public for a fairly broad brush dismissal of their reasonable concerns about important historical and political events. I would acknowledge that the ABC has to feature many compelling and significant political issues and cannot always give priority to particular interest groups and that -- nevertheless -- investigative journalism still has a vital place in our society, especially in regard to US wars in the Middle East and the war on terror. I would note that we still have no evidence, since 2001, that bin Laden is alive, and there is an increasing body of evidence that all of his later audio and video messages have been the product of US sponsored propaganda. And I would remind her that the Pentagon is on the record as manufacturing fake al Zaqarwi  letters and getting them published in the New York Times as part of its effort to sell the case that al Qaeda was prominent in Iraq. I would also remind her that prior to the Iraq invasion the Pentagon hired and paid over 200 ex-Defence officials to sell  the case for invading Iraq with the MSM while presenting themselves as independent commentators. I would encourage ABC editors, through her, to challenge US war propaganda as it arises and to deal critically with statements from US Defence officials. I would repeat my offer to write a 911 issues article at any time and to act as a resource if Catherine Taylor had any questions about particular 911 issues that may be of interest to her or the ABC.

In short, I'd be nice and keep the lines of access open, however limited those lines appear to you at this time. Pissing this nice lady off, or seeking to bully her will get you absolutely bupkis and engender a hostile attitude to 9/11 issues. Inviting activists to invade her email box (however well intentioned) is a bit like promising to send insurance salesmen around every hour of the day until she buys an insurance policy. How well do you think that would work?

There are times and places to be rude and confronting and there are times to be polite and welcoming. I encourage the second strategy here. I think the first is an absolute disaster. 

David Chandler Updates: 2 new videos and a video interview


David Chandler | 16 August 2010


1. I have completed a video showing the analysis of the Balzac-Vitry controlled demolition that used hydrolics rather than explosives to initiate a total demolition. This analysis shows deceleration upon collision, as predicted in the paper, "The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis," by Graeme MacQueen and Tony Szamboti. It also illustrates the symmetry of destruction, contrary to the "crush down" followed by "crush up" scenario propounded by Zdenek Bazant. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NiHeCjZlkr8

posted 17 Aug 2010 21:57 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

The Australian media blockade on 9/11 truth


Hereward Fenton | truthnews.com.au | 14 August 2010

Visit our podcast page:

Download audio » click here | Subscribe a Friend to TNRA!

TNRA is dedicated to getting vital information out to the widest possible audience, and in order to achieve our goals we sometimes need to use provocative techniques.

To this end, we are proud to launch the “Catherine Taylor project”.  Catherine Taylor is the associate editor of ABC The Drum Unleashed - Robust community debate - one of the biggest online opinion websites in Australia.

Catherine Taylor

Catherine Taylor is associate editor of ABC The Drum Unleashed.

I had the honour of writing an article on the 9/11 truth movement for Unleashed back in May 2008. The article achieved a record number of comments for the brief time it was open for comment. The moderators closed the discussion after only two days under pressure from trolls who claimed that there was a “campaign” at work. The ABC then immediately published two apallingly bad rebuttal pieces which you can find here and here. These articles are objectively devoid of journalistic merit and don’t engage with any single point raised in the original piece.

More than two years have gone by, and in that time the ABC has not published anything on the topic. The only time the topic has hit the media was in the re-broadcast of a shallow propaganda effort from the BBC titled “The Conspiracy Files“.

I attempted to address this imbalance last week and contacted Catherine by phone and email. You can read my first email and her reply here. You can read my second email here.

I am now inviting TNRA listeners and 9/11 truthers to contact ABC The Drum Unleashed to express your opinion directly.

The official email address for suggesting a contributor is: Unleashed@abc.net.au. You can also submit an email via an online form by clicking here. Make sure to address your email to Catherine Taylor.

You can contact Taylor by phone through the ABC switchboard on 02 8333 1500. Confidentiality issues prevent me from sharing Taylor’s direct email, however it is sufficient to note that email addresses at the ABC usually follow the form: Surname.Firstname@abc.net.au.

Please refrain from using threatening or abusive language as this will only damage our cause. Please keep your messages brief and succint and avoid bringing up speculative or fringe arguments which are not supported by the core of the 9/11 truth movment. Please don’t mention the word “Zionism”! Send your correspondence to us and we will publish it.

You can read a brief bio of Catherine Taylor here.

Our show tonight covers numerous other topics and Josh Jackson joins me to explore the topic of “Net Neutrality” which is a major theme in internet news at the moment.

Thanks for your help and thanks for listening!

Related Links

posted 16 Aug 2010 10:35 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

My reply to Catherine Taylor

To: 'Catherine Taylor'
Subject: RE: 9/11 Unanswered Questions - follow up

Dear Catherine,

The brevity of your reply is matched only by my passion and my determination
to break your shameful blockade on this subject - using all lawful means at
my disposal.

To say I am insulted by your response barely scratches the surface - I am
merely a messenger from a vast group of decent humanitarian people in this
country who you have knowingly denied a voice.

Let me be clear: your organisation has betrayed it's charter and we, the
people, will hold you to account for that - both personally and

Your job is funded by our taxes - the same taxes which are being used to
fund an unjust war based only on lies - lies which your organisation has
propped up from the beginning.

Ultimately this is about the age old struggle for liberty and human rights
Catherine. Your organisation has positioned itself firmly on the side of a
brutal, ruthless regime and you personally have allied yourself with their

How do you sleep at night, really?

Yours in truth
Hereward Fenton

My letter to Catherine Taylor - and her reply

I sent this email to Catherine Taylor, editor of ABC Unleashed. I append her reply at the end.

Sent: Tuesday, 10 August 2010 2:38 PM
To: Catherine Taylor
Subject: 9/11 Unanswered Questions - follow up

Dear Catherine,

Further to our conversation earlier today, I want to give you a few reasons why I think this is a good time to publish another article on the theme of "9/11 Unanswered Questions".

Firstly, may I draw your attention to an article which I wrote in May 2008:

At the time of writing, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
(http://ae911truth.org) was still in its infancy. Since then the number of registered members (all fully qualified architects and engineers) has swelled to over 1200. These professional men and and women have put their careers and reputations on the line in calling for a new subpoena-powered investigation into the collapse of 3 office towers on 9/11.

In November 2009 I filmed an impromptu interview at the Opera House between the founder of AE911Truth.org Richard Gage AIA and Jan Utzon, which was subsequently picked up by the Fairfax press:

During the same month, Richard Gage spoke at several events in Australia and New Zealand. Mr. Gage received very favourable coverage on New Zealand national television.

You can watch the TVNZ interview here:

In July 2010 Prof. Niels Harrit, lead author of a peer reviewed scientific paper examining explosive residue found in the dust of the collapsed towers, spoke to a capacity crowd in Sydney. This lecture was reviewed by Prof. Keith Suter on 2GB Radio on 19 July 2010.

You can listen to the 2GB review here:

Prof. Harrit's scientific paper can be found here:

Here is an interview with Niels Harrit from "Russia Today":

I don't wish to overload you with information at this stage, but I could easily provide a dozen more important news references.

The unanswered questions in relation to the collapse of the WTC form part of a much larger set of unanswered questions about 9/11, which form the basis of the "9/11 Truth Movement" - a worldwide group of activists seeking a new investigation of the 9/11 events.

A summary of important unanswered questions can be found on this page:

Other important 9/11 websites I would recommend include:


Catherine, I put it to you that questioning the official version of 9/11 has been virtually taboo in our media for years, and that this in itself is incompatible with democracy, and incomprehensible in a country such as ours.

It is indeed difficult for me to bring you something new on the subject when so much of the the older material has not even been canvassed in the mainstream.

Finally, let me quote from a recent AP article (1 August 2010):

"Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the professed mastermind of the attacks, and four alleged accomplices are still sequestered at Guantanamo without charges.
The Obama administration, after months of review, hasn't made a decision on whether to seek a military or civilian trial"

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has been held in legal limbo for years, and it is an uncontroversial fact that he was waterboarded (ie. tortured) 183 times.

I hope you will give this matter due consideration and I beg you to look into these questions with an open mind and an open heart.

best regards,
Hereward Fenton
m. 0415 059675


Hi Hereward,

Many thanks for the pitch but we will not run a piece on it at this time.



Busk for 9/11 Truth | Circular Quay | 15 August

Join us at Circular Quay for an afternoon of busking, street theatre and 9/11 truth outreach!

Museum of Contemporary Art

Sunday, August 15, 2010 11:00 AM

MCA (Museum of Contemporary Art)
140 George Street

RSVP: http://www.meetup.com/wearechange-oz/calendar/14109000/

Hi everyone,

Please join us this August 15th for the regular 9/11 street action! This month TMA are the hosts! We will repeat the hugely successful 'Busk for 911 Truth' That WAC Sydney organised last month.

WAC and TMA are keen to repeat the action as it was so successful. I encourage everyone to come along to this. Many of us are not musically gifted, that does not matter, regardless of you talents, it will be a fun day and a great opportunity to network with your community.

We urge you to come along with a poem, a song, choreography or any other form of performance!

Everyone is welcome to this event. if you don't feel like busking, just come along and enjoy the show!

Please bring your own material to share, dvds and flyers etc. If you need tips on how to mass produce DVDs, where to get the original etc, simply ask.

We will be outside the MCA near the water (see the huge building in the image, that one :)

This is an amazingly social platform for a 911 truth action, come along and enjoy Circular Quay in a different context! Truly hope to see you there (:

Phil Davis

posted 08 Aug 2010 21:40 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

9/11 Truth in Sweden

27 July 2010

Vaken.se Stockholm, Malmö and Denmark gathered on the 11th of July 2010 to spread the word of 9/11 Truth and the NWO agenda. A surprise gig by Wake Up Records artists Emanuel, Sabotage and André Matejic on the main square, we had a TV showing movies, loads of DVD:s and flyers were handed out. A great day for 9/11 Truth!

posted 07 Aug 2010 23:01 | Permalink | Leave a comment.

9/11 Health Bill: John Stewart gives up


Many of us remember how John Stewart took on the financial industry after a not so well thought out burst of opinion by CNBC's Rick Santelli on the floor of the CME. It lead to many discussions around the water cooler and the MSM elite had to send out a veteran cronie in Jim Cramer to try and smooth things out before some real truths about our financial system surfaced to the public conscienceness. With any luck, John Stewart's amdonishment of our pathetic and spineless congress in not passing the Zigroda 9/11 First Responder Health Care Bill will have the same effect. Here it is in case you missed it.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
I Give Up - 9/11 Responders Bill
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

"The New American Century" A Film by Massimo Mazzucco

Review by John Bursill | 8 August 2010

If you really want to know who "did" 9/11, this film "The New American Century" by Massimo Mazzucco does a great job at setting out both who called for it and who befitted from it!

While this production is successful in confronting deeply disturbing recent American and world history, its greatest achievement is that it presents the real and clear message that the American Neo-Cons are in control of our world at war today. It makes the case indirectly that their control will continue to be a reality until the real history of the events on September 11th, 2001 are confronted by the American public.


See: New American Century ; scroll down to watch a low quality version on Google video.

I would dispute the validity of the makers of this film speculation on the Pentagon attack regarding flight 77 hitting the building. But as they do not make any claims as to what happened I feel this film is fine for a wide distribution. In general it's solid, well made and hard evidence based! Unfortunately the creator of this film has promoted less well researched material and is seen by many as a classic "conspiracy theorist"; never the less this is a good film.

"The New American Century" reminds me why I am a 9/11 Truth Advocate and it steels my resolve to continue to fight for truth and justice until the end of the Neo-Con era.