Hello Craig,
Sorry I suggested you might be insane....
Have you ever wondered why people like me that are interested in your work and actually sent it out to their list are spending time refuting your argument? It is because you state that the "fly over" is irrefutable and simply a fact...let's look at the argument again;
For CIT;
1. You have one witness that saw the "fly over" and he is now not available for further interview, still his testimony stands.
2. You have twelve witnesses that saw the north approach but all believe that the plane hit the Pentagon, still you have some valid explanations for this.
3. You have no corroborating evidence besides the one witness that the "fly over" happened.
4. You support the assertion that the fly over happened by saying that the crash scene at the Pentagon is consistent with a south side approach and you have proven through your interviews that the north side approach is the only possible approach therefore the plane must of flown over the Pentagon.
5. You assert that all the witness testimony supporting the official south side version is fraudulent and that the whole scene at the Pentagon was staged involving hundreds of people planting evidence. The cab driver is your direct evidence of this staged event even though the cab driver still accepts the official report, yes I agree he is confused...so lets just discount him.
Against CIT
1. Not one person on the public record before you sort it volunteered a statement, report or comment that a fly over happened even though hundreds could have seen it and a great many should of heard it.
2. Only after the fact has one person said they saw a fly over.
3. Your twelve witnesses say they think the plane hit the Pentagon.
4. Many witnesses support the official report and are prepared to go on the record.
5. There is much wreckage consistent with a 757 crash at the Pentagon eg. Wheels, Landing Gear. pieces of fuselage and engine pieces.
6. There is a video showing "something" hitting the Pentagon.
7. None of the DFDR info supports the CIT north approach and no radar info supports it either, but as we know it appears that all this info provided by the government is erroneous, so lets discount that as well.
Ok so lets compare it to the case for CD of building 7.
For CD of 7
1. Many witnesses report explosions, count downs and orders to pull...on the day.
2. Forensic evidence shows unused explosives, the residue of explosives and the byproducts of explosives.
3. The video evidence proves the impossible collapse without added energy.
5. The buildings display all the hall marks of a controlled demolition.
6. 1000 A&E professionals support the CD hypothesis (with degrees)
7. Absolutely no precedent for this style of collapse with out explosives
Against CD of 7
1. NIST's computer model that no one has access to and that has failed to put many parameters into their calculation's or address the pure free fall of the building collapse.
2. Testimony from their employees that they are right and only a few at that.
Now one of those cases you could take to court and one you can do nothing with without more evidence...which one is it?
Regards John
PS _ I am not saying your "fly over" is not possible...