|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
31 Aug 2008, 06:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Kill Town, Wizard posted the solid explanation of how total penetration was absolutely expected 100% using simple know physics. Why did you ignore it and persist with your video-edit 'proofs' of TV fakery? http://www.911oz.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2469 Old 30 Aug 2008, 10:08 AM KillTown, could you please explain how the Conspirators planted 1000s of gallons of petrol in the floors that were to be ghost plane hit and also how they planted cutter-charges on the outer columns to make the hole for the ghost-plane, and also how they made sure that the columns would bend inwards so that it appeared that a real plane had struck. And also, how this was all so much easier than just hijacking planes and flying them into the towers. Also, can you please remind me of the explanation as to why the CGI team wasn't used to fake the Pentagon plane striking as well. Could you also explain what technology may have been used to track down ALL the amateur videographers on the street that day who caught the footage of the second tower exploding with NO PLANE in the footage and whether you believe these people were all assassinated and the footage destroyed in order to cover up that NO PLANES were used. Also, all the witnesses who saw the planes LIVE, I suppose that they were plants. Don't you think it would be easier for a dozen Mossad agents to install avionics already available on the market and just hijack the plane remotely? I suppose the conspirators were just bored of simple challenges and wanted to make the 9/11 event even more difficult by having to collect damaged debris from 767 wreckages and organise trucks to inconspicuously plant them all over the city, as well as the extensive and unprecedented pyrotechnics and explosives display they needed to mimick what would pretty much look like a plane exploding in the towers? Cheers. Also KillTown, assuming that you are correct about NO PLanes WTC (snerk), do you also accept that the NO PLane WTC arguments have been used extensively in mainstream hit-pieces to "mock" 9/11 Truth in the eyes of ill-informed public? And that one of the main reasons that public are instantly turned off looking further into all the websites for 9/11 Truth is because they come across this No PLane WTC arguments (that even 99% of the 9/11 Truthers can't face themselves) and so we lose them because of the hardest part of 9/11 Truth which is realising that the planes were faked? Also KillTown, do you agree, as evidenced in the Jenkins/Wood interview, that Dr Judy Wood seems to be mentally ill or retarded and apparently had no formal scientific training not even at year ten Physics level? yes I would leave the M16 there for all the gullible No-PLANE Huggers who would after several days of discussion with Woods and KillTown realise that they had been conned by COINTELPRO and then fall into a malnutritioned murderous rage and put earth out of your misery. Last edited by EzraPound; 31 Aug 2008 at 06:39 AM. 
|
|
|
|
#12
31 Aug 2008, 06:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Even the no planers just told me to f*ck off and go away. No one offered to hunt me down. (I see Ezra has now suggested you all 'off' each other rather than doing it himself) I don't know your motives Killtown. Until I learn different, I will believe you are simply mistaken, (good old fashioned delusion) rather than flagitious, nefarious, vile, depraved, unconscionable, wicked, dishonest, unscrupulous, deceitful, mendacious, false, iniquitous and criminal... (I LOVE the Thesaurus)  If you really believe this stuff I feel bad for you, but that's your issue, not mine. I do notice though that the focus is being drawn away from actual events of 911 into a world of animation, wild speculation and fantasy, and all this is fracturing the 911 movement. I have never been part of the 911 truth community, like some folks that are seriously into it here, (and feel betrayed) so I have somewhat of a neutral perspective on all this. Until my interest was peaked again some months back when I received 900 unpublished ground zero images, I did little serious research. I debated a few skeptics, and kept myself informed. That's about it. What has really amazed me lately though, is that some digital artifacts and anomalies plus some misinterpreted videos have created a cult like movement on Youtube based around 911. And, once I saw who was really faking videos, it surprised me. I find THAT truly fascinating.  Last edited by Wizard; 31 Aug 2008 at 06:50 AM.
|
|
#13
31 Aug 2008, 02:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
31 Aug 2008, 03:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If any of us no-planers said what Ezra said, we would have been banned faster than you can blink. Obvious this site applies its rules lopsided.
|
|
#15
31 Aug 2008, 03:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I live in Brazil. the Mods live in Australia. I usually have few hours to clarify any misinterpretations as you obviously had. intenge? Boa Dia!
|
|
#16
31 Aug 2008, 04:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
#17
31 Aug 2008, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
"Oh its on Youtube, it must be true"
|
|
#18
31 Aug 2008, 04:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#19
31 Aug 2008, 04:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But outside, what can YOU say about it? Not much given the clarification that followed. Obviously you are a tad paranoid?
|
|
#20
31 Aug 2008, 04:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I told you - perhaps it is a threat that I would leave you in a locked room with Judy Woods and an M16 in her hand? Or maybe Reynolds would get to it first? Up to you as you were lined up against the wall - I was out of there!!!!! To let you nutjobs argue about your theories about how mars and venus played a role in the physical events of 9/11, along with space-beams and pine trees toppling over just as you'd expect the towers to go 'poof', as Judy calls it. POOF. Hey KillTown, do you agree that the towers went like, "POOF"??? rsrsrs moita!
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
