Bizarre, Seemingly Deliberate Self Incrimination - Open Complicity: Anatomy of the 9/11 Cover-Up
Thanks to Christopher for alerting me to this video.
The thing about this video that makes it interesting to me is the unusual and original line of reasoning which it follows in order to propose the startling hypothesis that some of the "smoking guns" of 9/11 may have been deliberately placed, in order to both incriminate and protect the guilty parties.
The above statement may sound like an oxymoron - watch the video to understand how self incrimination may indeed be a form of cover for the perpetrators.
I would like see more such original ideas and research. The insider trading in particular is an area which is begging some thorough investigative journalism. I can see a best seller on this subject alone.
This is not fringe conspiracy theory, yet no prominent journalist will touch this subject. Even the "debunkers" such as James Meigs and George Monbiot tip toe around this evidence of high level foreknowledge which is surely as damning as the implosion of WTC 7.
The theory proposed in this video by Ann Arbor 9/11 Truth is like an Agatha Christie story where the the victim was stabbed 27 times by 27 different murderers - each for their own motives and benefits.
Mutual self incrimination by the criminals ensures they will continue to protect each other. Consider, for example:
- Larry "Pull it" Silverstein
- The "Project for a New Pearl Harbor"
- George "My Pet Goat" Bush
- Dick "Of course the orders still stand" Cheney
- Christie "The air is safe to breathe" Whitman
- Jane "Salomon Brothers Building Has Collapsed" Standley
Bizarre, seemingly deliberate, self incrimination.
Please check out the forum thread which I have posted on this topic.
